On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 11:49:47PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > > I think #1 and #2 can be handled by an on-stack copy of "struct > ip_options" high enough in the call chain, but #3 is a bit less > trivial to cope with like that. > > It would be nice to kill the IPCB() copy, and give us 12 bytes back in > skb->cb[] :-)
That would be great. I'm glad that Patrick's patch set is bringing out potential ways of shrinking sk_buff. -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
