On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 08:01:07AM -0500, jamal wrote:
> 
> Ok, here it is with the change to check the sysctl once. 
> 
> Brian, can you retest on your side - my basic tests pass.
> If it passes, just respond with an acked-by comment.
> 
> Dave, if (ACK from Brian && no further comments) please apply
> Also, same comment applies as before; this is a bug fix and you may
> wanna consider it as 2.6.15 material.
> 
> cheers,
> jamal
> 
> 

Okay, looks good for me.  It passes the battery of tests I've been
throwing at it.


BAPper


----------------------------------------------------------

This patch fixes the problem with promoting aliases when:
a) a single primary and > 1 secondary addresses
b) multiple primary addresses each with at least one secondary address

Based on earlier efforts from Brian Pomerantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Thomas Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Brian Pomerantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---

 include/net/route.h     |    3 +++
 net/ipv4/devinet.c      |   40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c |    2 +-
 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/route.h b/include/net/route.h
index dbe79ca..e3e5436 100644
--- a/include/net/route.h
+++ b/include/net/route.h
@@ -126,6 +126,9 @@ extern int          ip_rt_ioctl(unsigned int cmd
 extern void            ip_rt_get_source(u8 *src, struct rtable *rt);
 extern int             ip_rt_dump(struct sk_buff *skb,  struct 
netlink_callback *cb);
 
+struct in_ifaddr;
+extern void fib_add_ifaddr(struct in_ifaddr *);
+
 static inline void ip_rt_put(struct rtable * rt)
 {
        if (rt)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/devinet.c b/net/ipv4/devinet.c
index 4ec4b2c..04a6fe3 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/devinet.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/devinet.c
@@ -234,7 +234,10 @@ static void inet_del_ifa(struct in_devic
                         int destroy)
 {
        struct in_ifaddr *promote = NULL;
-       struct in_ifaddr *ifa1 = *ifap;
+       struct in_ifaddr *ifa, *ifa1 = *ifap;
+       struct in_ifaddr *last_prim = in_dev->ifa_list;
+       struct in_ifaddr *prev_prom = NULL;
+       int do_promote = IN_DEV_PROMOTE_SECONDARIES(in_dev);
 
        ASSERT_RTNL();
 
@@ -243,18 +246,22 @@ static void inet_del_ifa(struct in_devic
         **/
 
        if (!(ifa1->ifa_flags & IFA_F_SECONDARY)) {
-               struct in_ifaddr *ifa;
                struct in_ifaddr **ifap1 = &ifa1->ifa_next;
 
                while ((ifa = *ifap1) != NULL) {
+                       if (!do_promote && 
+                           ifa1->ifa_scope <= ifa->ifa_scope)
+                               last_prim = ifa;
+
-                       if (!(ifa->ifa_flags & IFA_F_SECONDARY) ||
+                       if (!do_promote ||
                            ifa1->ifa_mask != ifa->ifa_mask ||
                            !inet_ifa_match(ifa1->ifa_address, ifa)) {
                                ifap1 = &ifa->ifa_next;
+                               prev_prom = ifa;
                                continue;
                        }
 
-                       if (!IN_DEV_PROMOTE_SECONDARIES(in_dev)) {
+                       if (!do_promote) {
                                *ifap1 = ifa->ifa_next;
 
                                rtmsg_ifa(RTM_DELADDR, ifa);
@@ -283,18 +290,31 @@ static void inet_del_ifa(struct in_devic
         */
        rtmsg_ifa(RTM_DELADDR, ifa1);
        notifier_call_chain(&inetaddr_chain, NETDEV_DOWN, ifa1);
-       if (destroy) {
-               inet_free_ifa(ifa1);
 
-               if (!in_dev->ifa_list)
-                       inetdev_destroy(in_dev);
-       }
+       if (promote) {
+
+               if (prev_prom) {
+                       prev_prom->ifa_next = promote->ifa_next;
+                       promote->ifa_next = last_prim->ifa_next;
+                       last_prim->ifa_next = promote;
+               }
 
-       if (promote && IN_DEV_PROMOTE_SECONDARIES(in_dev)) {
-               /* not sure if we should send a delete notify first? */
                promote->ifa_flags &= ~IFA_F_SECONDARY;
                rtmsg_ifa(RTM_NEWADDR, promote);
                notifier_call_chain(&inetaddr_chain, NETDEV_UP, promote);
+               for (ifa = promote->ifa_next; ifa; ifa = ifa->ifa_next) {
+                       if (ifa1->ifa_mask != ifa->ifa_mask ||
+                           !inet_ifa_match(ifa1->ifa_address, ifa))
+                                       continue;
+                       fib_add_ifaddr(ifa);
+               }
+
+       }
+       if (destroy) {
+               inet_free_ifa(ifa1);
+
+               if (!in_dev->ifa_list)
+                       inetdev_destroy(in_dev);
        }
 }
 
diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c b/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
index 2267c1f..882f88f 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ static void fib_magic(int cmd, int type,
                tb->tb_delete(tb, &req.rtm, &rta, &req.nlh, NULL);
 }
 
-static void fib_add_ifaddr(struct in_ifaddr *ifa)
+void fib_add_ifaddr(struct in_ifaddr *ifa)
 {
        struct in_device *in_dev = ifa->ifa_dev;
        struct net_device *dev = in_dev->dev;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to