* Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-11-19 22:48
> Thomas Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > I did. I think it was right, why would an allocation be necessary on
> > the second call to inet6_dump_fib()? The walker allocated in process
> > context on the first call should be reused from cb->args[0].
> 
> Continued dumps are always called under spin lock (see netlink_dump).
> So we need to use GFP_ATOMIC in dumpers.

The continued dumps wouldn't be the problem, the walker is allocated
on the initial dump call. It was a mistake though, nlk->cb_lock spin
lock is always held for cb->dump() even though it should only be
required during the nlk->cb != NULL check. netlink_dump_start()
guarantees to only allow one dumper per socket at a time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to