From: Ben Greear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 14:14:42 -0700
> David S. Miller wrote: > > Doing an add_timer() for something already scheduled it fine. > > Does it actually cause a second timer to fire? If not, this > would keep us from correctly decrementing the reference count. Good point, it doesn't. That could lose a reference. > That sounds good to me, but how would the original code handle it? > Ie, when you call add_timer while the timer is already added, > did it choose the shortest time, or the longest? In this case the existing timeout is used. > > Oh, please stop doing this to every file you touch: > > > > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > > -/* > > +/* -*- linux-c -*- > > That allows me to keep the formatting correct (ie, tabs not spaces, etc) > when editing in Emacs. Please don't make me take these out! Nobody else needs this, you have two ways to deal with this: M-x c-set-style RET linux Or, in your .emacs file: (setq c-default-style '((other . "linux"))) which is what I do. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
