On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 07:19:21PM -0700, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > or a') make this a per-driver feature (e.g. NETIF_F_NETPOLL_CHALENGED) 
> >
> > In this case, even if driver cannot handle being called from IRQ 
> > context, netconsole still can be used, although in a little more 
> > limited fashion, but being safe and not causing lock ups, which, as 
> > far as I understand you, it was designed to help debugging in the 
> > first place :).
> 
> Again, there's basically no point to this at all. It won't catch an
> appreciable number of diagnostics that are not already caught by
> syslog and it won't work with kgdb-over-ethernet, netdump, etc.

Well, you're simplifying here. There are small embedded systems which 
don't have syslogd, serial cable connected. For such systems even 
softirq driven netpoll is useful.

Anyway, it's much more easier for me to just say to my driver users 
that netpoll is broken and isn't supported because of this, than 
arguing here. For some reason, I have a wrong impression, that you 
would want *more* users of your stuff.

-- 
Eugene

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to