In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 06 Sep 2005 13:05:16 -0700), Ben Greear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> neigh->nud_state = NUD_INCOMPLETE; > *** neigh_hold(neigh, NDRK_NEIGH_TIMER); > neigh->timer.expires = now + 1; > add_timer(&neigh->timer); : > Shouldn't we always do something similar to neigh->nud_state |= NUD_IN_TIMER > before calling the add_timer() method? NUD_IN_TIMER has a bit of NUD_INCOMPLETE. --yoshfuji - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
