In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 22 Aug 2005 13:08:28 +0200), Thomas Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> Collection of cleanups for fib6_lookup() that used to live in my tree > for a while now. > > Yoshfuji-san, what's the plan for CONFIG_IPV6_SUBTREES? Is MIPL > going to use it or can we remove it? For now I manually compiled > with CONFIG_IPV6_SUBTREES=1 but I have no idea how to actually > test it. MIPL2 will use "SUBTREE", and I'm trying to clean-up routing code including "SUBTREE." These patches conflict with my working tree, in fact. I'll try fixing my tree. Comment: It does not make sense to introduce fib6_root_node(), while leaving RTN_TL_ROOT and/or RTN_RTINFO. Otherwise, I'd eat them. Acked-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --yoshfuji - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
