On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 05:18:06PM +0200, Harald Welte wrote:
> Hi Dave!
> 
> The following trivial patch was confirmed to solve the problem.  Patrick
> also has no objections, so please apply this to mainline.

Please hold it back for another minute.  I'm still puzzled by this
problem.  I can neither reproduce it nor understand how the code could
end up in a state where it would try to do NAT on untracked connections.

Vladimir: Can you please send me the output of "iptables -t raw -L -vn"

are you sure the locally-generated ICMP errors in OUTPUT are matched by
your NOTRACK rules?

-- 
- Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                      http://gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)

Attachment: pgpTS2DdcCwUJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to