On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 10:50:41AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:06:45 +0200 > Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm interested in doing more complex stuff on inbound packets than > > what is currently possible with ing_filter (I understand ingress > > doesn't allow child classes , and can only drop/pass packets, not > > store one to send it later). > > > > While this is understandable because it would conflict with the > > benefits of NAPI by queueing and dropping packets much later, it > > prevents me from using Linux instead of FreeBSD's Dummynet (I'm > > working on network emulation-related stuff). > > > Why not just fix netem to work on imq?
I might look at that. What's the problem with netem & imq ? Also, I'm not sure I understand the difference between the "redirect to imq" and the "redirect to dummy" approaches. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
