Sevan Janiyan writes:
> Hello,

Hello Sevan,

> I've been trying to tidy up the wiki to cull old or duplicate content
> which we inherited from wiki.netbsd.se with the intention of adding
> useful info to the NetBSD guide and with that rejuvenating some of the
> content there before bringing the guide back to the wiki.
>

Thanks for improving the wiki!

> I stumbled across a copy of the guide in the wikisrc already which I'd
> not noticed before as I'd been mostly looking at the tutorials
> directory. The end result of the wikified version seems ok, what we lose
> in the power of docbook we gain in lower barrier to entry for contributions.
>
> docbook
> pros: multi format output, pro authoring platform for writing books
> cons: xml, pkgsrc/meta-pkgs/netbsd-www dependency list
>
> wiki
> pros: simple format (markdown)
> cons: no multi format output
>
> I was wondering if I did the work to reconvert (resync?) the NetBSD
> guide from docbook to the wiki, could we delete the docbook version?
> [...]

I find `The NetBSD Guide', `The pkgsrc guide' and `NetBSD Internals'
as books.  As them IMHO is very important to have a printer friendly
version of them (when I first started using NetBSD and pkgsrc one
of the first thing that I have done was printing both guides).

These days, especially for reference, I mostly consult their .txt
version by just opening netbsd.txt or pkgsrc.txt via the $PAGER.

If guides are migrated to wikisrc is it possible to:

 - have a PDF version of them?
 - have a text version of them?
 - have a single HTML page version of them?

Regarding the lower barrier, I think that as they are now - especially
for possible contributors without commit access - probably editing .xml
has several advantages as well:

 - repositories are available via anoncvs.n.o (that's not the case of
   wikisrc AFAIK).
 - when editing the .xml-s it is possible to directly check the results
   by just regenerating the .html or other formats via make.
 - IME when editing wikisrc markdown and using non trivial formatting it
   often violate the POLA.  When making XML formatting mistakes most of
   the times useful error messages are provided.

Reply via email to