On Mon, 12 May 2025 07:41:01 GMT, Volkan Yazici <vyaz...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> What about just doing `bind(null)`? This will create all the socket files >> with unique names in the system temp directory. Since no sub-directory is >> being created, there can't be a race trying to delete it. >> >> Or maybe this is what the test was doing originally and it ran into some >> other problem? > > I thought `bind(null)` was not an option, since all UDS-involving benchmarks > were designed with explicit file paths. Though upon closer look, I don't see > any reason why those can't simply be replaced with `bind(null)` – implemented > in 0b33d9321dd. Thanks to your suggestion, now this PR brings even a > healthier diet: > > > 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-) Tipped by @dfuch that `bind(null)` was probably avoided to not pollute `/tmp`. Per his suggestion, sticked to using `bind(null)`, though improved how we obtain the UDS file path in ffd31a462e. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24568#discussion_r2084462994
