On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 08:15:46 GMT, Daniel Jeliński <djelin...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Why? >> No users of `enumInterfaces` rely on the value returned in the second >> parameter when `enumInterfaces` returns a negative result. The same is true >> for `getAllInterfacesAndAddresses`. >> The second parameter was NULL-initialized in a few places; this >> initialization was not necessary and I just removed it to avoid confusion. > > ahh... I see your point now. I missed a few cases where the returned value > was referenced (free'd) even though the function failed. These should be > fixed now. Added null-initialization of return values on function entry. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6090
