On Sat, 22 May 2021 06:46:18 GMT, Alan Bateman <al...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Thanks, and if you want to keep it consistent with the existing code then >> you could rename "Socket newUdpSocket" and "biEx", or just change it to >> "return new Socket(...)". > > BTW: Is one retry enough? There is at least one other replace where we've had > to retry to workaround a macOS bug and one retry was enough there too. I have submitted a significant number of MACH5 job runs with repeat mode over the past week - approx 50 x 50, and observed the retry to have been triggered about 5 times, this gives some level of assurance that test stability will exist. But CI builds will exercise this a lot more. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4103
