On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 17:18:11 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов <github.com+10835776+stsypa...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> If that's the only use case, I recommend changing the return type to a >> deque, and replace the linked list with an array deque instead (as done >> elsewhere in this pr) > > Looks like it's never specified in JavaDoc which particular implementation of > List is used in fields of affected classes, so it's quite odd to me that > someone would rely on that when using reflection. But your point about > backward compatibility is reasonable, so I'll revert mentioned changes. Nothing outside of the JDK should be hacking into this private field of a non-exposed class, this should not be a concern here. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2744
