On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 14:32:41 GMT, Yasumasa Suenaga <ysuen...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> src/java.net.http/share/classes/jdk/internal/net/http/RequestPublishers.java >> line 426: >> >>> 424: is.close(); >>> 425: } catch (IOException ex2) {} >>> 426: return -1; >> >> } catch (IOException ex2) {} >> return -1; >> >> I wonder if the first exception `ex` should actually be rethrown here >> instead of returning `-1`. Have you tried to explore this possibility? > > `read()` is not have IOE as checked exception, and also currently IOE is > ignored. > So I ignored IOE at `close()` in this PR to minimize side-effect. Right. But I am not sure that is the right thing to do. If InputStream::read throws then it's likely that the request body will be missing some bytes, so the request should probably be cancelled/aborted at this point - rather than having a truncated body sent to the server. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1614