Hi Alex,
On 08/05/2020 15:35, Alex Kashchenko wrote:
On 05/06/2020 01:11 PM, Michael McMahon wrote:
Hi,
Yes, we've had some discussion about it internally, and while others may
yet have an opinion, I think this approach is a reasonable one, with a
spec change
that captures the behavior.
I've created a CSR for this issue listing the "return null" variant
above and "disable cache" as alternatives:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8244650
The wording for getJarFile() specification currently doesn't specify
what happens, when entry doesn't exist. If it is better to change this
wording - I would appreciate a guidance on that.
I believe some sort of spec change will be needed, if only to justify
challenging the JCK. Currently, the proposed change trips the following
test:
TestCase: [JarURLConnectionT216] FAIL->getManifest() did not throw
expected IOException for
jar:file:/JCK-runtime-15/tests/api/java_net/JarURLConnection//jardir/T11.jar!/NOJARENTRY.class
best regards,
-- daniel
[...]
