On 21/08/2019 11:09, Nick Gasson wrote:
Hi, Thanks Alan and Daniel for the suggestions. I've made these changes here: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ngasson/8229912/webrev.1/
This looks okay to me.Daniel - if there are other changes to this test then it might be worth re-examining the ensureXXX methods. The naming is very strange as they return a boolean. Also they print messages to say that the test is skipped but it's the caller that will determinate that, not the ensureXXX methods.