Thanks Daniel. Suggested changes made and new webrev at:

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/8199849/webrev.4/

- Michael.

On 06/08/2019, 14:37, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi Michael, Patrick,

BasicAuthentication.java:

  The two constructors might benefit from a bit of refactoring
  allowing them to share the code that encode the credentials.

BasicAuthenticator.java:

  76         if ("".equals(realm))

  I'd suggest using

             if (realm.isEmpty())

  If you do so you might also decide to add a comment that
  this is an implicit null check and decide to remove the
  previous line: Objects.requiresNonNull(realm).

BasicAuthenticatorCharset.java:

  This appears as a new test, yet it has a copyright
  line 2005, 2019, and two @bug refs?

  typo: setAuthenticatonPW

146 // should fail once with UNICODE_PW and unsupporting character set
 147         if (failCount != 1)
148 throw new RuntimeException("Fail count exceeded: 1 != " + failCount);

  well... OK. But technically the test could succeed
  if the failing charset didn't fail but the passing
  charset did.

  It would be much better to test that the charset that
  is expected to fail fails and that the charset that
  is expected to pass passes...

TestHttpUnicode.java

  Are the copyright years OK or is this just
  copy-paste mistake?

44 static class testAuthenticator extends java.net.Authenticator {

  can this class start with an upper case please?
  it's a bit confusing given that the server authenticator is a
  stored in a variable named `testAuthenticator` as well.


Otherwise, looks good to me!

best regards,

-- daniel


On 06/08/2019 12:44, Michael McMahon wrote:
This change went through a couple of rounds of review before, and I got diverted to something else
at the time. So, just picking it up now.

Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8199849

Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/8199849/webrev.3/index.html

CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8215275

The two tests were contributed by Patrick Concannon.

Thanks,
Michael.

Reply via email to