Daniel, > On 14 Mar 2019, at 11:10, Daniel Fuchs <daniel.fu...@oracle.com> wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > Thanks for fixing this, it is an important distinction!
Thanks for the review. > (and I like John's description of the issue :-)) > > I am wondering though - whether there's a relationship with > this bug, and JDK-8180754 [1]. The issues are somewhat related, but orthogonal. It feels like 8180754 should remove the erroneous assertion, but I would need to spend a little more time on it to know for sure. -Chris.
