On 12/10/18 03:46, Chris Yin wrote:
...Thanks for your suggestion, currently, I just added a comment to explain the 220 response message and sent updated webrev in earlier thread, I may prefer to process in that way for now if no objection since separate specific test added for 8151586 is already out of scope of current bug :). We may have another bug/enhancement to track it if necessary. Thanks
Agreed. > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xyin/8187522/webrev.01/ This looks good to me. -Chris.
