> On 11 Oct 2018, at 18:05, Daniel Fuchs <daniel.fu...@oracle.com> wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > On 11/10/2018 17:36, Michael McMahon wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> I was allowing for the possibility that the implementation might silently >> discard the header. In that case, the server would send the 500 response >> after detecting the "Via" header. > > I would agree if that was a JCK test, but here we are testing > the OpenJDK implementation - aren't we? This should probably be replaced with the unconditional: Assert.fail(“Unexpected response: ” + response); -Chris.
- RFR [12]: 8203850: java.net.http HTTP client should allow ... Michael McMahon
- Re: RFR [12]: 8203850: java.net.http HTTP client shou... Daniel Fuchs
- Re: RFR [12]: 8203850: java.net.http HTTP client ... Chris Hegarty
- Re: RFR [12]: 8203850: java.net.http HTTP client ... Michael McMahon
- Re: RFR [12]: 8203850: java.net.http HTTP cli... Daniel Fuchs
- Re: RFR [12]: 8203850: java.net.http HTTP... Michael McMahon
- Re: RFR [12]: 8203850: java.net.http... Daniel Fuchs
- Re: RFR [12]: 8203850: java.net.... Chris Hegarty
- Re: RFR [12]: 8203850: java.net.http HTTP client ... Thomas Lußnig
- Re: RFR [12]: 8203850: java.net.http HTTP cli... Michael McMahon