Hi Nezih,

The client’s version is a default preferred version for requests that do not 
specify an explicit version. As such, it does not prevent requests, attempting 
to negotiate HTTP/2, from being sent, just that it is not the default. Given 
that, then the priority value is still be applicable to client’s build with a 
preferred HTTP/1.1 version.

-Chris.

> On 1 Aug 2018, at 10:56, nezih yigitbasi <nezihyigitb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> Priority is only defined for version HTTP_2 (and that's clear from the 
> javadoc). However, it's possible to construct an instance of HttpClient with 
> a priority value and with version HTTP_1_1 (tested with Java "9.0.1"). I feel 
> that it will be less error prone for the users if conflicting combinations of 
> arguments weren't allowed. It's also confusing when I read the below code as 
> it doesn't make sense to set the priority for HTTP/1.1. What do you think?
> 
> HttpClient client = HttpClient.newBuilder()
>         .executor(httpClientExecutor)
>         .priority(32)
>         .version(HTTP_1_1)
>         .build();
> 
> Thanks,
> Nezih

Reply via email to