Hi Nezih, The client’s version is a default preferred version for requests that do not specify an explicit version. As such, it does not prevent requests, attempting to negotiate HTTP/2, from being sent, just that it is not the default. Given that, then the priority value is still be applicable to client’s build with a preferred HTTP/1.1 version.
-Chris. > On 1 Aug 2018, at 10:56, nezih yigitbasi <nezihyigitb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > Priority is only defined for version HTTP_2 (and that's clear from the > javadoc). However, it's possible to construct an instance of HttpClient with > a priority value and with version HTTP_1_1 (tested with Java "9.0.1"). I feel > that it will be less error prone for the users if conflicting combinations of > arguments weren't allowed. It's also confusing when I read the below code as > it doesn't make sense to set the priority for HTTP/1.1. What do you think? > > HttpClient client = HttpClient.newBuilder() > .executor(httpClientExecutor) > .priority(32) > .version(HTTP_1_1) > .build(); > > Thanks, > Nezih