Hi Claes,
Looks fine,
Roger
On 2/14/2018 11:36 AM, Claes Redestad wrote:
Right, I expanded the range as much as possible given the constraint
provided by L_ENCODED minus '/'. I will think of a better comment to
this effect.
/Claes
Daniel Fuchs <daniel.fu...@oracle.com> skrev: (14 februari 2018
17:25:20 CET)
Hi Claes,
Your proposed changes to ParseUtil look reasonable
to me, though I had to carefully compare the characters
in the range (c >= '&' && c <= ':') with the
L_ENCODED / H_ENCODED masks to convince myself
that there was no behavior change to
ParseUtil::firstEncodeIndex.
I wonder whether this would deserve some additional
comment - though I'm not sure how it could be formulated.
Given the sensitivity of the impacted code maybe it would
be prudent to wait for a second review before pushing.
best regards,
-- daniel
On 14/02/2018 15:30, Claes Redestad wrote:
Hi, as a means to improve startup in some applications, please
review this set of small improvements to improve both
interpreted and compiled performance of creating and handling
certain jar URLs. Some of the changes in
sun.net.www.ParseUtil::encodePath have a small, positive
effect when dealing with other types of path resources. Bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8197849 Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8197849/jdk.00/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eredestad/8197849/jdk.00/> This
shaves off a percent or so of the total bytecode execution in
a few of our startup tests: - ParseUtil::encodePath cost is
reduced ~20% during startup, averaging ~10-15% faster for
typical inputs after JIT. Weird examples like paths only
consisting of slashes and dots can be seen to take a small hit
due to not getting special treatment. -
ParseUtil::canonizeString cost on startup reduced by 50% (~15%
improvement after JIT) for typical inputs by adding a test to
return directly if there's no need to "canonize" the string
(which is typically always the case for well-formed jar
files). I added a sanity test to ensure I didn't accidentally
change semantics of cases that would lead to canonicalization.
- Removed a couple of unnecessary allocation in
sun.net.www.protocol.jar.Handler. Maybe there are some good
reasons not to make ParseUtil a final utility class with only
static methods and a private constructor, though... Thanks!
/Claes
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.