Thanks for the review Daniel.

On 20/12/17 09:29, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi Chris,

This looks good to me. I wonder if the implementations of Susbscriber
in the tests should be strengthened.

Yes, I think so.

I see that onError or onNext could throw exception - and
though SubscriberAdapter seems to (partly) cater for it in
onError, it doesn't do anything for onNext.

Added a try/catch to handle this.

I also wonder if the wrapper (SubscriberAdapter) should forcefully
cancel the subscribtion if its wrappee (the test Subscriber) throws
unexpected errors or unchecked exception in onError/onNext/onComplete

I think that would be best. Done.

With some of these "thin" wrapper subscribers it's hard to know
how much checking to perform, versus just pass-through to the
downstream subscriber. I think the balance is right now.

I also added additional cases for "too few" and "too many" bytes
being published, as well as a few more NPE specific checks on
the Publisher and Subscribers.

Updated webrev:
  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8193365/webrev.02/

-Chris.

best regards,

-- daniel

For instance I see that

On 15/12/2017 15:37, Chris Hegarty wrote:
This review is for 8193365 [1], to improve interoperability
between HTTP Client's BodyPublisher/BodySubscriber and
Flow.Subscriber/Publisher, that was raised as part of
feedback on JEP 321 [2].

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8193365/webrev.01/

-Chris.

[1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193365
[2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2017-December/thread.html#11063

Reply via email to