Hi Daniel,
I'm not sure: I have no love for whitebox tests in general, and
especially not for code where doing exhaustive black box tests against a
public API is possible and perhaps even straightforward (the test
coverage seems adequate currently, but can of course always be improved).
/Claes
On 2017-08-30 18:16, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi Claes,
Maybe it could be interesting to leave the
methods in a static inner class which is
not referenced (except by whitebox tests) and
have this inner class expose a static test()
method that would test that the static fields
in URI have the expected value?
This is just a suggestion, and it
could be done in a followup RFE...
best regards,
-- daniel
On 31/08/2017 16:26, Claes Redestad wrote:
On 2017-08-30 17:17, Alan Bateman wrote:
I think it could be useful as someone reading the code isn't going
to immediately know to jump to URI.
Done: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8186930/jdk.01/
/Claes
