Thanks, Chris. So then I'm asking for approval now...
Best regards Christoph > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Hegarty [mailto:chris.hega...@oracle.com] > Sent: Dienstag, 18. Oktober 2016 12:53 > To: Langer, Christoph <christoph.lan...@sap.com> > Cc: jdk8u-...@openjdk.java.net; Mark Sheppard > <mark.shepp...@oracle.com>; net-dev@openjdk.java.net > Subject: Re: [8u-dev] Request for Review + Approval: Backport of 8163181: > Further improvements for Unix NetworkInterface native implementation > > > > On 17 Oct 2016, at 09:38, Langer, Christoph <christoph.lan...@sap.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > please review (@Chris or Mark) and approve the following downpour. > > From my point of view, I’m ok with this. You still need 8u maintainer > approval. > > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8163181 > > Original Change: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/40c3550625a2 > > New Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8163181.8udev/ > > Mail discussion: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2016- > September/010207.html > > > > The main motivation for this downport is the bug in the AIX version of > enumIPv6Interfaces. > > > > As the whole change is merely formatting, I decided to ask for a full > downport. The patch does not apply cleanly, I had to resolve a little bit and > also > added some further formatting cleanups to be mostly identical with the JDK 9 > version of NetworkInterface.c now. > > > > Thanks and best regards > > Christoph > > -Chris.
