> > > > You see there'a thing. That's why I didn't do it immediately. For example > let's > consider a "Sec-WebSocket-Extensions" (a very good illustrative example.) > RFC 6455 states it very clearly [1]: > > The |Sec-WebSocket-Extensions| header field MAY appear multiple times > in an HTTP request (which is logically the same as a single > |Sec-WebSocket-Extensions| header field that contains all values. > However, the |Sec-WebSocket-Extensions| header field MUST NOT appear > more than once in an HTTP response. >
This is fixed in Errata ID: 3433 [1] Jitu [1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6455&rec_status=15&presentation=records
