On 3 Sep 2015, at 11:49, Andrej Golovnin <andrej.golov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Chris, > >> Will adding the ability to send ping(ByteBuffer) be sufficient for your >> usage? If so, then I think we should add it, but not pong. The >> implementation will automatically send a pong message in response to >> receiving a ping. OK? > > Yes, ping(ByteBuffer) is sufficient for us. I assume you will also need a way to distinguish that the incoming data is from a pong message, in response to your ping, right? -Chris. > Best regards, > Andrej Golovnin
