On 16/01/15 12:50, Konstantin Shefov wrote:
Hi Chris, Alan, thank you for reviewing.
I have made a new webrev
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kshefov/6933879/webrev.01
I have removed ":" and added a test case.
This looks ok to me.
-Chris.
-Konstantin
16.01.2015 14:42, Chris Hegarty пишет:
On 16/01/15 11:29, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 16/01/2015 10:49, Chris Hegarty wrote:
:
I don't see any reason to update the spec here, given that the set of
allowable character is not clearly defined in the relevant RFC's.
I think we need to create a bug to look into this more. Inet6Address
allows the scope of be any String but URI puts restrictions on what is
legal. The proposed change updates the list of allowed characters but I
assume it will need to re-visited again as systems with more exotic
interface names are encountered.
Yes that is possible, but to date this is the first time I've seen
this come up.
Given the lack of clear specification in the relevant RFC's (relating
to scope ids ), I don't think we should be making too many
specification changes in this area. But I agree with your comment, URI
has a restriction that it not clearly specified in the Java spec.
-Chris.
