On 30/09/14 17:31, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 30/09/2014 08:21, Mark Sheppard wrote:
Hi

Please oblige and review the following small change to test
test/java/net/InetAddress/IPv4Formats.java

--- a/test/java/net/InetAddress/IPv4Formats.java        Tue Sep 30
13:25:04 2014 +0100
+++ b/test/java/net/InetAddress/IPv4Formats.java        Tue Sep 30
15:11:05 2014 +0100
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
             {"126.1", "126.0.0.1"},
             {"128.50.65534", "128.50.255.254"},
             {"192.168.1.2", "192.168.1.2"},
-            {"hello.foo.bar", null},
+            {"somehost.some-domain", null},
             {"1024.1.2.3", null},
             {"128.14.66000", null }
This looks okay to me, at least until somehost.some-domain starts to be
resolved to some address :-)

I wonder: would something like

  "x-" + UUID.randomUUID().toString() + "-x.some-domain"

result in a syntactically valid address? If so it might
reduce the chances of collision...

best regards,

-- daniel


-Alan

Reply via email to