..and finally pushed to JDK 9.

  http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/ea0d59f39e8f

I will request backports to both 8u and 7u.

-Chris.

On 15/04/14 18:54, Steven Lawrance wrote:
Thanks! Hopefully, it can also get backported to JDK7, but it's good
that it can get fixed in at least JDK9.


Steven Lawrance


On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Andreas Rieber
<rieberandr...@gmail.com <mailto:rieberandr...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    Hi Chris,

    i have also checked this problem and yes: the proxy header can end
    on the server side. The fix looks right. I have rewritten the test
    so it is in the right place and using existing certificate. I guess
    Steven would like to see this fix going in somehow ;-)

    I did run a full jtreg test on ubuntu, jdk 9 dev and jdk 9, where
    this test fails.

    Bug:
    https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8025710

    Webrev:
    http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arieber/8025710/webrev.00/

    thanks
    Andreas



    On 24.12.2013 15:01, Chris Hegarty wrote:
    Andreas, Steven,

    I updated the bug and assigned it to myself ( to remind me to
    sponsor the change ). I'll need to look at the changes in a little
    more detail, but at first glance they look right to me. I will
    also look to see if the test can be reduced a little, and add
    appropriate jtreg tags ( to allow it to be run in our test
    environment ).

    Thanks,
    -Chris

    On 24 Dec 2013, at 08:44, Andreas Rieber <rieberandr...@gmail.com
    <mailto:rieberandr...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    Hi Steven,

    On 24.12.2013 00:41, Steven Lawrance wrote:
    Hi net-dev,

    I filed this on September 26 at bugs.sun.com
    <http://bugs.sun.com>, which assigned bug ID 9007104 to it, but
    that bug still does not appear to be visible. I'm emailing in
    case if that system malfunctioned. I now see that OpenJDK has a
    Bugzilla system, but I don't have an account to file this bug.

    Your bug is visible in new JBS at:
    https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8025710

    - Andreas

    cut
    ...



Reply via email to