On Oct 1, 2013, at 1:25 PM, Michael McMahon wrote: >> The approach I initially was going to take was to retry once after a short >> wait and then fail with the proposed exception if the retry failed. > > I'm not sure about the short wait. I know the submitter claims that it worked > after 50ms, but I don't > think we could generalise that behavior in the library. Maybe, there is value > in repeating immediately, though > it is less likely the temporary condition will have resolved.
It does seem better to let the calling code retry if it wants based on the class of the exception. Brian
