On 8/24/2012 9:32 PM, Shirish Kuncolienkar wrote:
On 8/24/2012 5:39 PM, Michael McMahon wrote:
On 23/08/12 18:50, Shirish Kuncolienkar wrote:
Could I get the change reviewed please
This behavior is seen on Windows.
Logic in URLClassPath.getLoader() does not take care of an URL which
looks like "jar:file:/C:/test/xyz.jar!/". The logic ends up choosing
a FileLoader instead of a JarLoader. JarLoader has provision for
closing file handles, so choosing a JarLoader will solve the
problem. Secondly the constructor of JarLoader blindly adds a prefix
and suffix to the provided URL to make it look like a jar URL.
Changed the code here to conditionally append/prepend
The change set can be found at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shirishk/7183373/webrev.0/
-Shirish
Shirish,
I have a slight concern that this would modify the Loader class to be
used in some circumstances
completely independent of the requirements of URLClassLoader.close().
This is very sensitive code.
Would it be possible to fix this within the context of whatever
loader is currently being invoked?
- Michael
Michael,
Thanks for the review comments. The second version of the fix is
uploaded at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shirishk/7183373/webrev.2/
Could you please take a look at this one ?
Description of the fix:
URLClassPath.Loader.findResource() method opens a connection to the
provided URL to test whether the URL is good. Here the Jar file gets
opened but does not get closed because the created stream as
setUseCaches set to true.
Just out of curiosity I would like to know bit more on "some
circumstances completely independent of the requirements of
URLClassLoader.close()". I see that the Loader classes are private in
nature and are being used within the context of the URLClassPath.
We create an instance of JarLoader for all the jars that are on the
extension class loader path by adding "jar" , "!/" to the file url
which comes as the input. The reason behind the first fix was that if
we have a url like this why not use a JarLoader instance.
- Shirish
Michael,
Did you get a chance to look at the new patch?
-Shirish
