On 12/01/2011 06:21 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 01/12/2011 01:13, Charles Lee wrote:
Yes. In the customer scenario, the return value is 169.254.*.*/16
address.
Sorry for all the questions but I'm still scratching my head as to how
the lookup of the current host's name ends up with a list that
includes these addresses. Is it definitely a behavior change in 2008
R2 or is it possible that the customer has configured the hosts file
this way?
-Alan.
It is definitely a behavior change in 2008 R2.
--
Yours Charles