On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 23:07 +0800, Charles Lee wrote: > On 10/26/2011 06:31 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote: > > On 26/10/2011 10:36, Alan Bateman wrote: > >> On 26/10/2011 10:24, Charles Lee wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> />>> I don't think this code has changed too much since then and > >>> probably could do with a clean-up./ > >>> Not true. > >> I'm talking about the InetAddress* code, that hasn't changed > >> significantly and probably could do with some modernization now. > > > > Yes, please submit a patch for this cleanup and we'll review it. > > > > -Chris. > > > >> > >> -Alan. > > > Hi Chris, Alan and Neil, > > Here is the rest of the patch (attached). The patch is a little big > because some formats. >
For ease of review, I've uploaded this change (ie. the combination of Charles' 'patch.contr.v1' and 'patch.contr.part2') as a webrev [1]. My initial (and picky) observation is that the code indentation needs a little work to comply with the OpenJDK coding conventions [2]. (Particularly using a standard indentation for 4 spaces). Regards, Neil [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ngmr/ojdk-229/webrev.00/ [2] http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/codeconventions-150003.pdf -- Unless stated above: IBM email: neil_richards at uk.ibm.com IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
