Ah ok. I finally get it.
In which case I think you original changes should be fine. Do you want
to make similar changes to MulticastSocket and post the diffs?
Also, I think a testcase would be useful here. I know it's not strictly
specified that the socket should be closed if the constructor throws,
but it does seem desirable.
-Chris.
On 08/29/11 07:14 PM, Salter, Thomas A wrote:
I believe you're referring to the close() in the catch clause following the
call to getImpl().bind. The problem I encountered was when the Datagram.bind
threw an exception before it got that far. In my case, the checkListen was
throwing a SecurityException, but any of the earlier throws would cause the
same problem. The SecurityException wouldn't have been caught by the catch
addressed by the CR in any case. We encountered this while running the TCK.
One of its tests tries to create lots of sockets, all of them getting security
violations until we hit a limit on the number of open sockets.
public synchronized void bind(SocketAddress addr) throws SocketException {
if (isClosed())
throw new SocketException("Socket is closed");
if (isBound())
throw new SocketException("already bound");
if (addr == null)
addr = new InetSocketAddress(0);
if (!(addr instanceof InetSocketAddress))
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Unsupported address type!");
InetSocketAddress epoint = (InetSocketAddress) addr;
if (epoint.isUnresolved())
throw new SocketException("Unresolved address");
InetAddress iaddr = epoint.getAddress();
int port = epoint.getPort();
checkAddress(iaddr, "bind");
SecurityManager sec = System.getSecurityManager();
if (sec != null) {
sec.checkListen(port);<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< This throws a
SecurityException
}
try {
getImpl().bind(port, iaddr);
} catch (SocketException e) {
getImpl().close();
throw e;
}
bound = true;
}
Tom.
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Hegarty [mailto:chris.hega...@oracle.com]
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2011 1:56 PM
To: Salter, Thomas A
Cc: net-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: Datagram socket leak
[take two!]
Tom,
This specific area of code was changed recently due to CR 7035556 [1],
changeset [2], and this issue was discussed during the code review [3].
Essentially, bind() already closes the impl internally before throwing
the exception. Does this resolve the issue for you? Or do you still see
potential to leak?
-Chris
[1] http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7035556
[2] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/07a12583d4ea
[3] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2011-July/003318.html
On 08/29/11 03:27 PM, Salter, Thomas A wrote:
There appears to be a socket leak in both DatagramSocket and
MulticastSocket constructors. Both classes have constructors that create
a socket and then attempt to bind. The bind can fail with a variety of
exceptions none of which are caught by the constructor. Thus, the actual
system socket that was allocated by impl.create() is never closed.
My fix was to wrap a try-finally around the bind call and call close()
if isBound is false.
public DatagramSocket(SocketAddress bindaddr) throws SocketException {
// create a datagram socket.
createImpl();
if (bindaddr != null) {
try {
bind(bindaddr);
} finally {
if( !isBound() )
close();
}
}
}
Tom Salter
Unisys Corporation
