Some initial (picky) comments:

1) "Thread Safety
    Instances of UrlEncodedQueryString are not not synchronized."

    Typo: "not not".

    I would expand this a little. Maybe taking wording similar to
    java.util.HashMap:

     "Note that this implementation is not synchronized. If multiple
     threads access a query string concurrently, and at least one of the
     threads modifies the query string, it must be synchronized
     externally. This is typically accomplished by synchronizing on some
     object that naturally encapsulates the query string."

2) Consistency when documenting to how separators are handled.

   parse(java.net.URI uri)
    "...When parsing, all separators from the Separators enum are
    recognised."

    I would change this as follows:
    "...When parsing, all Separators are recognised."

3) getParameterValues

   "Returns an array of String objects containing all of the values
    the named parameter has, or null if the parameter does not exist.

    If the parameter has a single value, the array has a length of 1."

   Should read:
   "Returns a List of String objects containing all of the values
    the named parameter has, or..."

    How about returning an empty list if the parameter does not exist?
    Similar to getParameterNames, "an empty Iterator if there are no
    parameters"

    Also, typo in @returns
     "an List of String objects..." -> "a List of String objects..."

-Chris.

Richard Kennard wrote:

Michael,

I have further updated URLEncodedQueryString to incorporate everybody's JavaDoc feedback:

https://jdk-collaboration.dev.java.net/servlets/ProjectForumMessageView?messageID=20908&forumID=1463

Hoped to hear from you soon,

Richard.



Reply via email to