AFAIK, HBO now/go is running on the newer Broadpeak gear+umbrella (Paseo)... at least for LatAm.
> Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 12:01:33 -0700 > From: Jared Geiger <ja...@compuwizz.net> > To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> > Subject: Re: Disney+ CDN > Message-ID: > <CAHuchRBwmnUBYCk=1fobsvm-vhbgi8waxpuqhdbwxbckqco...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > An article mentioned BAMTech's platform which is what NHL, MLB, and HBO GO > are built on. The bits from the first two come from Akamai and Level3 CDNs. > I haven't looked into where HBO Go comes from. > >> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:58 PM Aaron Gould <aar...@gvtc.com> wrote: >> >> Have we found out yet if Disney+ will have a CDN? Like Netflix oca, >> Akamai aanp, google ggc, facebook fna … a Disney isp-located cdn presence ? >> >> >> >> disneyplus.com >> >> >> >> -Aaron >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] *On Behalf Of *Aaron Graves >> *Sent:* Saturday, December 29, 2018 7:22 PM >> *To:* nanog@nanog.org >> *Subject:* Disney+ CDN >> >> >> >> Anyone know what Disney is planning on doing for streaming content >> distribution once they leave Netflix? Would be nice if they'd provide an >> on-prem cache server. >> >> >> >> AG >> > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190412/50f1332e/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 12:03:10 -0700 (PDT) > From: Mark Milhollan <m...@pixelgate.net> > To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org> > Subject: Re: Gi Firewall for mobile subscribers > Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1904121153310.32548@arcghar.ybpny> > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed > >> On Thu, 11 Apr 2019, Tore Anderson wrote: >> >> We've been wanting to replace our all of our ad-hoc OOB links with a >> standardised setup based on LTE connectivity to an embedded >> login/console server at each PoP. IPv6 would be perfect due to no >> CGNAT and infinitesimal levels of background scanning. >> >> Unfortunately Telenor has decided to deploy a central firewall that >> drops all inbound connections, making their service totally unusable >> for our use case. I guess they don't want our money. > > Sounds like the console server will need to "phone home". That a > workaround might be possible doesn't make a firewall which the user > cannot control to some degree less annoying. Though it might be that > Telenor just needs to be notified/reminded that power users and business > customers exist. > > > /mark > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 15:31:24 -0400 > From: Chris Grundemann <cgrundem...@gmail.com> > To: Jared Geiger <ja...@compuwizz.net> > Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> > Subject: Re: Disney+ CDN > Message-ID: > <CAC1-dt=tFfZGv=ACX8b1vB6-0X3DY=rqe0ha6uklkxunixo...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > >> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 3:03 PM Jared Geiger <ja...@compuwizz.net> wrote: >> >> An article mentioned BAMTech's platform which is what NHL, MLB, and HBO GO >> are built on. The bits from the first two come from Akamai and Level3 CDNs. >> I haven't looked into where HBO Go comes from. >> > > Yep, they decided to buy BAMTech and build their own: > https://www.thewaltdisneycompany.com/walt-disney-company-acquire-majority-ownership-bamtech/ > > > > >> >>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:58 PM Aaron Gould <aar...@gvtc.com> wrote: >>> >>> Have we found out yet if Disney+ will have a CDN? Like Netflix oca, >>> Akamai aanp, google ggc, facebook fna … a Disney isp-located cdn presence ? >>> >>> >>> >>> disneyplus.com >>> >>> >>> >>> -Aaron >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] *On Behalf Of *Aaron >>> Graves >>> *Sent:* Saturday, December 29, 2018 7:22 PM >>> *To:* nanog@nanog.org >>> *Subject:* Disney+ CDN >>> >>> >>> >>> Anyone know what Disney is planning on doing for streaming content >>> distribution once they leave Netflix? Would be nice if they'd provide an >>> on-prem cache server. >>> >>> >>> >>> AG >>> >> > > -- > @ChrisGrundemann > http://chrisgrundemann.com > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190412/c0b47cad/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 15:34:22 -0400 > From: Tom Beecher <beec...@beecher.cc> > To: Jared Geiger <ja...@compuwizz.net> > Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> > Subject: Re: Disney+ CDN > Message-ID: > <CAL9Qcx6LVWBDSL7Likc=vcuhpx+yx3hgsa5jyp+edqc19te...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > I wouldn't expect them to build out anything until they got some usage data > to determine the build/buy economics. > >> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 3:02 PM Jared Geiger <ja...@compuwizz.net> wrote: >> >> An article mentioned BAMTech's platform which is what NHL, MLB, and HBO GO >> are built on. The bits from the first two come from Akamai and Level3 CDNs. >> I haven't looked into where HBO Go comes from. >> >>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:58 PM Aaron Gould <aar...@gvtc.com> wrote: >>> >>> Have we found out yet if Disney+ will have a CDN? Like Netflix oca, >>> Akamai aanp, google ggc, facebook fna … a Disney isp-located cdn presence ? >>> >>> >>> >>> disneyplus.com >>> >>> >>> >>> -Aaron >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] *On Behalf Of *Aaron >>> Graves >>> *Sent:* Saturday, December 29, 2018 7:22 PM >>> *To:* nanog@nanog.org >>> *Subject:* Disney+ CDN >>> >>> >>> >>> Anyone know what Disney is planning on doing for streaming content >>> distribution once they leave Netflix? Would be nice if they'd provide an >>> on-prem cache server. >>> >>> >>> >>> AG >>> >> > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190412/82d94b92/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 14:37:54 -0500 (CDT) > From: Mike Hammett <na...@ics-il.net> > To: Chris Grundemann <cgrundem...@gmail.com> > Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>, Jared Geiger <ja...@compuwizz.net> > Subject: Re: Disney+ CDN > Message-ID: > <1660830854.2724.1555097871560.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > $1.6B for less than half of the company and they don't even source the bits > themselves? Hrm.... > > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > > Midwest Internet Exchange > > The Brothers WISP > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Chris Grundemann" <cgrundem...@gmail.com> > To: "Jared Geiger" <ja...@compuwizz.net> > Cc: "NANOG" <nanog@nanog.org> > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2019 2:31:24 PM > Subject: Re: Disney+ CDN > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 3:03 PM Jared Geiger < ja...@compuwizz.net > wrote: > > > > An article mentioned BAMTech's platform which is what NHL, MLB, and HBO GO > are built on. The bits from the first two come from Akamai and Level3 CDNs. I > haven't looked into where HBO Go comes from. > > > > Yep, they decided to buy BAMTech and build their own: > https://www.thewaltdisneycompany.com/walt-disney-company-acquire-majority-ownership-bamtech/ > > > > > <blockquote> > > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:58 PM Aaron Gould < aar...@gvtc.com > wrote: > > <blockquote> > > > > Have we found out yet if Disney+ will have a CDN? Like Netflix oca, Akamai > aanp, google ggc, facebook fna … a Disney isp-located cdn presence ? > > disneyplus.com > > -Aaron > > > > From: NANOG [mailto: nanog-boun...@nanog.org ] On Behalf Of Aaron Graves > Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2018 7:22 PM > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Disney+ CDN > > > Anyone know what Disney is planning on doing for streaming content > distribution once they leave Netflix? Would be nice if they'd provide an > on-prem cache server. > > > > AG > </blockquote> > > </blockquote> > > > > -- > > @ChrisGrundemann > http://chrisgrundemann.com > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190412/0458e5b4/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 19:42:30 +0000 > From: Luke Guillory <lguill...@reservetele.com> > To: Mike Hammett <na...@ics-il.net>, Chris Grundemann > <cgrundem...@gmail.com> > Cc: Jared Geiger <ja...@compuwizz.net>, NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> > Subject: RE: Disney+ CDN > Message-ID: > <8d89f96b7ab1b84f9e049cc7bb91bf5c027fd35...@rtc-exch01.reserve.lds> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > They owned 33% and bought another 42% making it an even 75%. > > > > > Luke > > > ns > > > > > > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2019 2:38 PM > To: Chris Grundemann > Cc: Jared Geiger; NANOG > Subject: Re: Disney+ CDN > > $1.6B for less than half of the company and they don't even source the bits > themselves? Hrm.... > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions<http://www.ics-il.com/> > [http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png]<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange<http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > [http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP<http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > [http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/youtubeicon.png]<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ________________________________ > From: "Chris Grundemann" <cgrundem...@gmail.com<mailto:cgrundem...@gmail.com>> > To: "Jared Geiger" <ja...@compuwizz.net<mailto:ja...@compuwizz.net>> > Cc: "NANOG" <nanog@nanog.org<mailto:nanog@nanog.org>> > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2019 2:31:24 PM > Subject: Re: Disney+ CDN > > > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 3:03 PM Jared Geiger > <ja...@compuwizz.net<mailto:ja...@compuwizz.net>> wrote: > An article mentioned BAMTech's platform which is what NHL, MLB, and HBO GO > are built on. The bits from the first two come from Akamai and Level3 CDNs. I > haven't looked into where HBO Go comes from. > > Yep, they decided to buy BAMTech and build their own: > https://www.thewaltdisneycompany.com/walt-disney-company-acquire-majority-ownership-bamtech/ > > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:58 PM Aaron Gould > <aar...@gvtc.com<mailto:aar...@gvtc.com>> wrote: > Have we found out yet if Disney+ will have a CDN? Like Netflix oca, Akamai > aanp, google ggc, facebook fna … a Disney isp-located cdn presence ? > > disneyplus.com<http://disneyplus.com> > > -Aaron > > > > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org<mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org>] > On Behalf Of Aaron Graves > Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2018 7:22 PM > To: nanog@nanog.org<mailto:nanog@nanog.org> > Subject: Disney+ CDN > > Anyone know what Disney is planning on doing for streaming content > distribution once they leave Netflix? Would be nice if they'd provide an > on-prem cache server. > > AG > > > -- > @ChrisGrundemann > http://chrisgrundemann.com > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190412/e51d9b3f/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 13:23:29 -0700 > From: "Scott Weeks" <sur...@mauigateway.com> > To: <nanog@nanog.org> > Subject: Re: Disney+ CDN > Message-ID: <20190412132329.4039...@m0117459.ppops.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > > > --- cgrundem...@gmail.com wrote: > From: Chris Grundemann <cgrundem...@gmail.com> > > Yep, they decided to buy BAMTech and build their own: > https://www.thewaltdisneycompany.com/walt-disney-company-acquire-majority-ownership-bamtech/ > ---------------------------------------------------- > > > https://www.bamtechmedia.com/company > > 2004 - "Patent awarded for GeoLocation" > > I'd be interested in learning about how well that one works! > > scott > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 19:43:56 -0400 > From: "Valdis Kl=?utf-8?Q?=c4=93?=tnieks" <valdis.kletni...@vt.edu> > To: sur...@mauigateway.com > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: Disney+ CDN > Message-ID: <1720.1555112636@turing-police> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 13:23:29 -0700, "Scott Weeks" said: > >> 2004 - "Patent awarded for GeoLocation" >> >> I'd be interested in learning about how well that one works! > > Under US law, ideas submitted for patent need be "non-obvious". There's no > requirement they actually be a good idea. Though I guess that it should > prevent > the patenting of obvious bad ideas - but $DEITY knows there's plenty of subtly > flawed concepts out there.... (And there's ample evidence that the USPTO is > on > occasion challenged by the "obviousness" requirement...) > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 10 > Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 11:13:48 +0200 > From: Tore Anderson <t...@fud.no> > To: Mark Milhollan <m...@pixelgate.net>, NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org> > Subject: Re: Gi Firewall for mobile subscribers > Message-ID: <6e81e3d5-ed9b-eedc-5ec8-be782e477...@fud.no> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > * Mark Milhollan >>> On Thu, 11 Apr 2019, Tore Anderson wrote: >>> >>> We've been wanting to replace our all of our ad-hoc OOB links with a >>> standardised setup based on LTE connectivity to an embedded >>> login/console server at each PoP. IPv6 would be perfect due to no >>> CGNAT and infinitesimal levels of background scanning. >>> >>> Unfortunately Telenor has decided to deploy a central firewall that >>> drops all inbound connections, making their service totally unusable >>> for our use case. I guess they don't want our money. >> >> Sounds like the console server will need to "phone home". That a workaround >> might be possible doesn't make a firewall which the user cannot control to >> some degree less annoying. Though it might be that Telenor just needs to be >> notified/reminded that power users and business customers exist. > > Phoning home is not an option here, as the whole point is to have an OOB > backdoor that works even if «home» is totally FUBAR. > > For that reason it needs to be completely independent of the production > network. Standard Internet connections are perfect, IFF they are > bi-directional. > > Tore > > > End of NANOG Digest, Vol 135, Issue 13 > **************************************
