> From: Saku Ytti <s...@ytti.fi> > Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 6:01 PM > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 7:55 PM <adamv0...@netconsultings.com> wrote: > > > This was on Trio and sorry I should have clarified we did test with default > L3+L4 keys on MPLS labelled packets -default in Junos (as baseline). > > And then repeated the test using flow labels -which forced Trio to ignore > the L3+L4 keys and act solely on flow label. > > PPS performance wise we couldn’t really tell the difference (was in the > noise). > > Are you sure we are talking about same thing. This thread is about 20bit IPv6 > header Flow Label. I feel like you're talking about FAT pseudowires? > Yes right, but the lookup principle is the same either you look at IPv6 flow label or you look at the Entropy label.
> By default JNPR will in pseudowire transit look for IP keys, with or without > FAT. Optionally it can look even with existence of CW. You need to > specifically ask it not to look for IP keys in pseudowires or add CW (and not > explicitly tell it to look). > We didn't use FAT PWs, but rather entropy labels for VPNv4 traffic. adam
