On 12 Feb 2019, at 01:52, Jay Borkenhagen <j...@braeburn.org> wrote: > We got some very good advice watching this video from your most recent > NLNOG day: > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vrzl__yGqLE > > ... but there is one place where I disagree with Niels.
You’re of course welcome to do so :-) > He advised > against lowering the local-pref of invalid routes. I agree that this > should not be anyone's target policy, but it is a useful step along > the way. To set invalid routes a lower local-pref, one needs to > establish RTR sessions from routers to relying party servers, and to > configure a policy that takes validation state into account. I agree that this is a good approach for taking first steps into the RPKI world and I would not discourage a lower local preference as a first stage. As long as we’re on the same page about invalid == reject being the intended end result. > In short: C'mon in! The water's fine! :-) As a competitive swimmer I couldn’t agree more! -- Niels Raijer ni...@fusix.nl
