> > I’m not sure if you have to be in Cleveland or Cincinnati, but Cyxtera has > an AMAZING data center in Columbus. (The DC can withstand winds up 140 MPH, > is on the Century Link backbone, and has a solid rubber roof with no holes > or cooling systems on the roof.)
Being on the CenturyLink backbone doesn't sound like a selling point to me... On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 8:46 PM David Kehoe <dke...@pdmi.com> wrote: > Former employer was in Expedient’s DC. You can honestly do better than > Expedient. Look into the Power Redundancy, Cooling Efficiency of the > building, if the site is a purpose built DC (Expedient in Cleveland is > not). Is Cloud Connect for backups important? Have you identified your > requirements? If you need a starting point look at the following: Data > Center Certification (from the Uptime Institute), Distance, Compliance (if > needed), Level of Controlled Access, Power SLA, N+1 Cooling, Multi-Homed > ISPs, Uptime %, Monitoring, NOC, Purpose Built DC. > > > > Involta has a really good data center in Independence, Akron, and a very > impressive site near Pittsburgh. They would give you the option of having > Hot/Hot datacenters with their connectivity. I’m not sure if you have to be > in Cleveland or Cincinnati, but Cyxtera has an AMAZING data center in > Columbus. (The DC can withstand winds up 140 MPH, is on the Century Link > backbone, and has a solid rubber roof with no holes or cooling systems on > the roof.) > > > > Thank you, > > > > *David Kehoe* > > > > *From:* NANOG <nanog-boun...@nanog.org> *On Behalf Of * > nanog-requ...@nanog.org > *Sent:* Friday, January 4, 2019 7:00 AM > *To:* nanog@nanog.org > *Subject:* NANOG Digest, Vol 132, Issue 4 > > > > Send NANOG mailing list submissions to > nanog@nanog.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > nanog-requ...@nanog.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > nanog-ow...@nanog.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of NANOG digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Cleveland/Cincinnati Co-location > (Allen McKinley Kitchen (gmail)) > 2. Re: Service Provider NetFlow Collectors (Aaron) > 3. Re: Cleveland/Cincinnati Co-location (Shawn Ritchie) > 4. Re: Announcing Peering-LAN prefixes to customers (Andy Davidson) > 5. Report on Legal Barriers to RPKI Adoption (Christopher S. Yoo) > 6. 192.208.19.0/24 hijack transiting 209, 286, 3320, 5511, 6461, > 6762, 6830, 8220, 9002, 12956 (Dominik Bay) > 7. Re: 192.208.19.0/24 hijack transiting 209, 286, 3320, 5511, > 6461, 6762, 6830, 8220, 9002, 12956 (Jeff Shultz) > 8. Astronaut accidently calls 911 from space (Sean Donelan) > 9. Re: Cellular backup connections (Dovid Bender) > 10. Re: 192.208.19.0/24 hijack transiting 209, 286, 3320, 5511, > 6461, 6762, 6830, 8220, 9002, 12956 (Job Snijders) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 10:50:45 -0500 > From: "Allen McKinley Kitchen (gmail)" > <allenmckinleykitc...@gmail.com> > To: "Justin M. Streiner" <strein...@gmail.com> > Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> > Subject: Re: Cleveland/Cincinnati Co-location > Message-ID: <91679af9-e310-463c-b427-630f69c02...@gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > +1 for Expedient. Not a current customer but a VERY satisfied former > customer. (Decision to leave them was a foul case of penny-pincher > mismanagement, above my pay grade and over my objections.) > > ..Allen > > > On Jan 3, 2019, at 01:00, Justin M. Streiner <strein...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 1 Jan 2019, Mitchell Lewis wrote: > >> > >> I am working on project that may involve building points of presence in > Cleveland & Cincinnati. Any suggestions as to which colocation facility in > each city to build in? The prime factor of consideration for this project > is access to waves to places like Chicago, New York & Ashburn. It would be > nice to have multiple wave provider options to choose from. > >> > >> I have been looking at Cyrus One-7thStreet in Cincinnati & Databank in > Cleveland. > > > > Expedient has two facilities in Cleveland that might be worth looking at. > > > > Thank you > > jms > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 11:21:32 -0600 > From: Shawn Ritchie <m...@shawnritchie.com> > To: "Allen McKinley Kitchen (gmail)" <allenmckinleykitc...@gmail.com> > Cc: "Justin M. Streiner" <strein...@gmail.com>, NANOG > <nanog@nanog.org> > Subject: Re: Cleveland/Cincinnati Co-location > Message-ID: <19433ff4-0e0c-4d7a-9cf2-cf385ae0a...@fastmail.fm> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > On Jan 3, 2019, at 9:50 AM, Allen McKinley Kitchen (gmail) < > allenmckinleykitc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > +1 for Expedient. Not a current customer but a VERY satisfied former > customer. (Decision to leave them was a foul case of penny-pincher > mismanagement, above my pay grade and over my objections.) > > > > ..Allen > > > >> On Jan 3, 2019, at 01:00, Justin M. Streiner <strein...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2019, Mitchell Lewis wrote: > >>> > >>> I am working on project that may involve building points of presence > in Cleveland & Cincinnati. Any suggestions as to which colocation facility > in each city to build in? The prime factor of consideration for this > project is access to waves to places like Chicago, New York & Ashburn. It > would be nice to have multiple wave provider options to choose from. > >>> > >>> I have been looking at Cyrus One-7thStreet in Cincinnati & Databank in > Cleveland. > >> > >> Expedient has two facilities in Cleveland that might be worth looking > at. > >> > >> Thank you > >> jms > > I’m in Expedient’s Cleveland DC and will second that they’re decent. > > — > Shawn > > ------------------------------ > > End of NANOG Digest, Vol 132, Issue 4 > ************************************* >
