Yes, in some countries (NOT in US, AFAIK) court can issue an order to block IP/domain/URL.
If home operator of crime man is blocking the direct access - he have to use TOR/VPN/... to avoid blocking (or may be you really believe he just stop any tries to watch his lovely CP?) If he use TOR/VPN/... to avoid blocking - the original home IP address will be changed to the exit node of TOR/VPN - and we will lost any chance to catch the crime man. Is it clear? 11.12.18 21:06, John Lee пише: > It is my understanding that ISPs block IP addresses and domains under > court order now for copyright violations, criminal activity which would > include CP. They require a court order as they cannot ascertain if it is > CP or not, that is a Law Enforcement decision. The US Supreme Court > decision's was just being nude is not lewd, also with aging software > which can regress photos, LEOs in the US have to ascertain if this is CP > or photo shopped. > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 12:54 PM Max Tulyev <max...@netassist.ua > <mailto:max...@netassist.ua>> wrote: > > ...and you will see the TOR exit nodes instead of crime home IP if > censorship is implemented. > > 11.12.18 19:35, Aaron1 пише: > > ... The only thing I can think of is the idea that I’ve heard > before is > > the way to catch someone is to watch them well they are accessing, the > > concept of honeypots comes to mind > > > > Aaron > > > > On Dec 11, 2018, at 10:43 AM, Larry Allen <mrallen1...@gmail.com > <mailto:mrallen1...@gmail.com> > > <mailto:mrallen1...@gmail.com <mailto:mrallen1...@gmail.com>>> wrote: > > > >> I can't imagine a single rational argument against this. > >> > >> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018, 10:56 William Anderson <ne...@well.com > <mailto:ne...@well.com> > >> <mailto:ne...@well.com <mailto:ne...@well.com>> wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 at 06:08, Lotia, Pratik M > >> <pratik.lo...@charter.com <mailto:pratik.lo...@charter.com> > <mailto:pratik.lo...@charter.com <mailto:pratik.lo...@charter.com>>> > wrote: > >> > >> Hello all, was curious to know the community’s opinion on > >> whether an ISP should block domains hosting CPE (child > >> pornography exploitation) content? Interpol has a ‘worst-of’ > >> list which contains such domains and it wants ISPs to > block it. > >> > >> > >> This already happens in the UK, and has done for years. > >> > >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_abuse_image_content_list > >> > >> > >> -n > >> >