Agree
El 7/12/18 a las 06:14, Owen DeLong escribió: > How is it that Interpol isn’t taking over/shutting down these domains > in the DNS at the registry/registrar level? > > The GAC pushed hard for the provisions that allow them to do so and > there’s a pretty clear (and quick) process for it. > > Owen > > >> On Dec 6, 2018, at 22:06 , Lotia, Pratik M <pratik.lo...@charter.com >> <mailto:pratik.lo...@charter.com>> wrote: >> >> Hello all, was curious to know the community’s opinion on whether an >> ISP should block domains hosting CPE (child pornography exploitation) >> content? Interpol has a ‘worst-of’ list which contains such domains >> and it wants ISPs to block it. >> On one side we want the ISP to not do any kind of censorship or >> inspection of customer traffic (customers are paying for pipes – not >> for filtered pipes), on the other side morals/ethics come into play. >> Keep in mind that if an ISP is blocking it would mean that it is also >> logging the information (source IP) and law agencies might be wanting >> access to it. >> >> Wondering if any operator is actively doing it or has ever considered >> doing it? >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> With Gratitude, >> * * >> *Pratik Lotia* >> >> “Information is not knowledge.” >> The contents of this e-mail message and >> any attachments are intended solely for the >> addressee(s) and may contain confidential >> and/or legally privileged information. If you >> are not the intended recipient of this message >> or if this message has been addressed to you >> in error, please immediately alert the sender >> by reply e-mail and then delete this message >> and any attachments. If you are not the >> intended recipient, you are notified that >> any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, >> or storage of this message or any attachment >> is strictly prohibited. >
