A few of us at my startup worked with onap for a few months last year as part of a container security project for a large telco. It was a bit of a PIA to get going. Att open sourced it in name - an enterprise sw project that was built by a large team over several years with lots of people coming and going. So I’d say don’t expect an easy go if it.
Onap was a popular topic at kubecon last year - lots of telcos medium and large looking at it, so due to popularity maybe the community support has improved in the last year. Excuse any typos - sent from mobile device > On Nov 30, 2018, at 5:53 AM, <adamv0...@netconsultings.com> > <adamv0...@netconsultings.com> wrote: > > Hi gents, > > I'm looking for physical network services orchestration framework for > network service providers that could later be used/extended to orchestrate > other areas of the business (virtualized services in DC, etc..). > So far it appears to me that there's no such ready-made commercial product > on the market that would contain all the building blocks I'd be interested > in (well especially the easy to use service designer tool). > ECOMP and now OANP seem to have it all and much more I'm just curious if > anyone is using it in anger (or parts of it for that matter) for > orchestration/design/automation of services on physical network. > I'd like to hear some stories from trenches with regards to the > implementation, but I'd be also interested in your thoughts in case you just > assessed the tool for implementation (why did liked not liked about it). > > > Thank you > > adam > > netconsultings.com > ::carrier-class solutions for the telecommunications industry:: >
