On Wed, 10 Oct 2018, Naslund, Steve wrote:
I am wondering if this seems common to most of you on here. In my area
it seems that all cellular sites have backup generators and battery
backup. Seems like the biggest issues we see are devices remote from
the central offices that lose power and cause disruptions, like RSTs
and SLCs. During hurricane Katrina we saw a lot of active outside
plant devices underwater and that caused lots of disruption even when
the CO survived.
As Hurricane Michael moves across the southeast, cell carriers will report
to the FCC how many cell sites are out of service.
Generally, there are more cell sites in cities. The loss of a city cell
site is less severe because neighboring cell sites are close to overlap
the area. There are more sources of backup power, and fuel (natural gas,
diesel, etc) for generators. In cities, cell sites are less exposed on
buildings than free-standing cell towers. COWs, COLTs, etc. are also more
quickly deployed in cities. COWs and COLTs need connectivity to the PSTN
to work, and there are most connection options in cities.
In rural areas, there are fewer cell sites, spread further apart. The loss
of even a single cell sites in rural areas often has a huge impact
compared to cell sites in cities because no nearby towers, difficult to
reach for repairs, electical grid is sparser. Land is cheaper in rural
areas, so its cheaper to install a solar panel array. But as happened in
Puerto Rico, solar panels don't survive Catagory 5 hurricanes any better
than cell towers.
Long way to say
Both city and rural cell sites have some backup power (usually batteries).
You just notice the loss of a few cell towers in rural areas more than the
same number of cell sites in cities. Of course, catastrophic damage such
as in Puerto Rico impacts everywhere.
