Hi Ross, How would you gauge good DNS performance?
Warm regards, Michael. On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 at 10:50, Ross Tajvar <r...@tajvar.io> wrote: > Do note that ping response times are not a good indicator of DNS > performance. > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018, 3:48 AM Michael Bullut <m...@kipsang.com> wrote: > >> Greetings Team, >> >> Has anyone deployed the aforementioned in your individual networks? A >> quick test suggests it is quite fast compared with Google's D.N.S. >> resolvers: >> >> *C:\Users\bullutm>ping 1.1.1.1* >> >> *Pinging 1.1.1.1 with 32 bytes of data:* >> *Reply from 1.1.1.1 <http://1.1.1.1/>: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=61* >> *Reply from 1.1.1.1 <http://1.1.1.1/>: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=61* >> *Reply from 1.1.1.1 <http://1.1.1.1/>: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=61* >> *Reply from 1.1.1.1 <http://1.1.1.1/>: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=61* >> >> *Ping statistics for 1.1.1.1 <http://1.1.1.1/>:* >> * Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),* >> *Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:* >> * Minimum = 3ms, Maximum = 8ms, Average = 4ms* >> >> *C:\Users\bullutm>* >> >> *-------* >> >> *C:\Users\bullutm>tracert 1.1.1.1* >> >> *Tracing route to one.one.one.one [1.1.1.1]* >> *over a maximum of 30 hops:* >> >> * 1 4 ms 3 ms 4 ms 10.101.129.254* >> * 2 6 ms 20 ms 7 ms 10.98.0.165* >> * 3 7 ms 13 ms 15 ms 10.98.0.233* >> * 4 7 ms 5 ms 4 ms one.one.one.one [1.1.1.1]* >> >> *Trace complete.* >> >> *C:\Users\bullutm>* >> >> Warm regards, >> >> Michael Bullut. >> >> --- >> >> *Cell:* >> *+254 723 393 114.**Skype Name:* *Michael Bullut.* >> *Twitter:* >> * @Kipsang <http://twitter.com/Kipsang/>* >> *Blog: http://www.kipsang.com/ <http://www.kipsang.com/>* >> *E-mail:* *m...@kipsang.com <m...@kipsang.com>* >> >> *---* >> >
