> On Sep 17, 2018, at 8:48 AM, Jared Mauch <ja...@puck.nether.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Sep 17, 2018, at 6:54 AM, Tom Ammon <thomasam...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'm looking to understand the impact of CG-NAT on a set of netflix OCAs, in
>> an ISP environment. I see in Netflix's FAQ on the subject that traffic
>> sourced from RFC 1918/6598 endpoints can't be delivered to the OCA. Is this
>> simply a matter of deploying the OCA on the outside of the CGN layer? What
>> are the other consequences of CGN upon the OCA?
>>
>
> Yes, you want to deploy it outside your CG-NAT.
>
> I also strongly suggest you look at how to get native IPv6 from your clients
> behind the CG-NAT rolled out. I know many folks have had issues with various
> CDNs and the number of devices that reach out. This is why folks get the
> Google captcha, etc.
>
> Giving those end-users an alternate way out will help. I understand this may
> take effort and is harder for folks using UBNT & Tik gear in a smaller
> environment, but there is value for your end-users.
>
> - Jared
>
Actually, Tik gear fully supports IPv6, so only UBNT gear is really an issue
here.
Owen
