In fact, today I also received comments about the preferences with
Juniper, even with its BNG software mounted on a server.
Thank you all for the responses.
El 08/08/18 a las 18:11, Tony Wicks escribió:
Cisco ASR1k can support up to 64K PPPoE depending on the model/cards. Juniper
MX and Nokia 7750 can scale up to a couple of hundred thousands depending on
the model. The thing to bear in mind is the ASR1000 is a CPU based router, this
means it is very flexible (NAT/L2TP etc can just turn on without extra cards)
but throughput is limited to your processor capacity and what you turn on. The
Juniper MX and Nokia 7750 are more hardware based routers that can massively
scale but you need to work closely with the vendor to ensure you have
appropriate cards for your intended application. Personally I have used all of
these solutions and I would stray towards the Juniper. This being said the
Nokia is also a magnificent box albeit a bit less user friendly IMHO.
-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG <nanog-boun...@nanog.org> On Behalf Of Clayton Zekelman
Sent: Thursday, 9 August 2018 8:50 AM
To: Jose Jorquera <josejorquer...@gmail.com>; Mauro Gasparini
<ma...@interlink.com.ar>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: PPPoE Server
I'll second that. Juniper MX works well for us. We have one router terminating
10,000 PPPoE and 3,500 L2TP and it handles the load fine.
At 04:43 PM 08/08/2018, Jose Jorquera wrote:
Cisco is the any option? I read about BRAS server on Juniper MX-480,can
you check "Juniper one day: dynamic subscriber management†for more
info.
El 08-08-2018, a las 15:22, Mauro Gasparini
<ma...@interlink.com.ar> escribió:
Good afternoon people.
I would like to advice me some appliance or
software (running on top level server line) which supports 20,000
simultaneous PPPoE connections.
The customer has a Cisco ASR1000 but I don't
have any confirmed experience that can support it.
Mauro Gasparini.
