s/NDP/MLD/ On 08/08/2018 11:36 PM, na...@jack.fr.eu.org wrote: > On 08/08/2018 11:27 PM, Saku Ytti wrote: >> On Wed, 8 Aug 2018 at 23:53, Stan Barber <s...@academ.com> wrote: >> Another 'we fixed a problem in IPv6', which turned out to be worse >> than the original problem and was quietly ignored in practical >> networks. >> > > Let me fix that for you. > Using multicast on IPv6 grant us the ability to do more. > Today, this is worthless. > Will it be the same tomorrow ? > > Multicast without NDP is broadcast, thus for that particular thing, ipv6 > is just better than ipv4. >
- Multicast traffic % in enterprise ne... Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) via NANOG
- Re: Multicast traffic % in ente... nanog
- Re: Multicast traffic % in ... Curtis, Bruce
- Re: Multicast traffic % in ente... Stan Barber
- Re: Multicast traffic % in ... Saku Ytti
- Re: Multicast traffic %... nanog
- Re: Multicast traff... nanog
- Re: Multicast traff... Thomas Bellman
- Re: Multicast traffic % in ... Greg Shepherd
- Re: Multicast traffic %... Curtis, Bruce
- Re: Multicast traff... Greg Shepherd
- Re: Multicast traff... Jethro R Binks
- Re: Multicast ... James Bensley
- Re: Multic... Brandon Butterworth
- Re: Multic... Alan Buxey
- Re: Multicast ... Brandon Butterworth
- Re: Multicast traffic % in ente... Justin M. Streiner