On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 10:04:17PM -0700, Eric Kuhnke wrote: > If you were setting up something new from a clean sheet of paper design - > do you consider it appropriate to have an abuse role inbox that's dedicated > to actual network abuse issues (security problems, DDoS, IP hijacks, > misbehavior of downstream customers, etc), and keep that separate from DMCA > notifications?
Separate, because you'll need to design/implement different defenses for them. For example: abuse@ *must* accept traffic with attached malware, since victims of abuse may forward messages containing said malware. But dmca@ doesn't need to and shouldn't. ---rsk